<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Schwarzer speaks, and other ramblings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fulham.theoffside.com/team-news/schwarzer-speaks-and-other-ramblings.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fulham.theoffside.com/team-news/schwarzer-speaks-and-other-ramblings.html</link>
	<description>The only Fulham podcast on the planet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:14:05 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://fulham.theoffside.com/team-news/schwarzer-speaks-and-other-ramblings.html#comment-3283</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 23:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fulham.theoffside.com/team-news/schwarzer-speaks-and-other-ramblings.html#comment-3283</guid>
		<description>Hello mate,

Fair enough. I think MAF&#039;s &#039;Man Utd of the South&#039; comment was one of those outlandish things he said when he brought in Keegan and Wilkins and sacked Micky Adams (unfairly in my view). The media used it as a stick to beat him with when we didn&#039;t take the Premier League by storm, but to be mid-table in the top flight wouldn&#039;t really have been considering underachieving by too many Fulham fans at that time.

Would certainly agree with you about Roy&#039;s results. But to turn us into anything more than &#039;little old Fulham&#039; we&#039;d have to be producing regular top ten finishes and making more frequent journeys into Europe. If we can start outperforming our capital rivals on a regular basis, then maybe we&#039;ll feature a bit higher on the London-centric media&#039;s radar.

Personally, as you can no doubt tell, I&#039;m a bit of a sentimentalist who likes the tradition, the history and the romance of the ground. Of course, when I was first introduced to Fulham, the football was so bad it was almost a sideshow. Look at how far we&#039;ve come!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello mate,</p>
<p>Fair enough. I think MAF&#8217;s &#8216;Man Utd of the South&#8217; comment was one of those outlandish things he said when he brought in Keegan and Wilkins and sacked Micky Adams (unfairly in my view). The media used it as a stick to beat him with when we didn&#8217;t take the Premier League by storm, but to be mid-table in the top flight wouldn&#8217;t really have been considering underachieving by too many Fulham fans at that time.</p>
<p>Would certainly agree with you about Roy&#8217;s results. But to turn us into anything more than &#8216;little old Fulham&#8217; we&#8217;d have to be producing regular top ten finishes and making more frequent journeys into Europe. If we can start outperforming our capital rivals on a regular basis, then maybe we&#8217;ll feature a bit higher on the London-centric media&#8217;s radar.</p>
<p>Personally, as you can no doubt tell, I&#8217;m a bit of a sentimentalist who likes the tradition, the history and the romance of the ground. Of course, when I was first introduced to Fulham, the football was so bad it was almost a sideshow. Look at how far we&#8217;ve come!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timmyg</title>
		<link>http://fulham.theoffside.com/team-news/schwarzer-speaks-and-other-ramblings.html#comment-3282</link>
		<dc:creator>timmyg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 22:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fulham.theoffside.com/team-news/schwarzer-speaks-and-other-ramblings.html#comment-3282</guid>
		<description>Hey Dan -- I didn&#039;t mean Tigana himself underachieved. But that was the image of the club while we were in the top flight and were saying how we&#039;d be the ManU of the South. Again, I wasn&#039;t a fan then but thats the jist I have been getting.

And perhaps you are correct about the traditions of the club being its image.

 But then I would go as far as to say that Roy, maybe for just this year (who knows), has made the put some results behind the tradition. Rather than this &#039;little old fulham&#039; image, perhaps it could be more. 

I dunno, I&#039;m going to keep my eye on it. 

I think we&#039;re both onto something though...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Dan &#8212; I didn&#8217;t mean Tigana himself underachieved. But that was the image of the club while we were in the top flight and were saying how we&#8217;d be the ManU of the South. Again, I wasn&#8217;t a fan then but thats the jist I have been getting.</p>
<p>And perhaps you are correct about the traditions of the club being its image.</p>
<p> But then I would go as far as to say that Roy, maybe for just this year (who knows), has made the put some results behind the tradition. Rather than this &#8216;little old fulham&#8217; image, perhaps it could be more. </p>
<p>I dunno, I&#8217;m going to keep my eye on it. </p>
<p>I think we&#8217;re both onto something though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://fulham.theoffside.com/team-news/schwarzer-speaks-and-other-ramblings.html#comment-3281</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 21:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fulham.theoffside.com/team-news/schwarzer-speaks-and-other-ramblings.html#comment-3281</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s pretty harsh to say Tigana underachieved. He got us up at the first time of asking, playing beautiful football and took us to an FA Cup semi-final and the third round of the UEFA Cup. The fact that he had to contend with boardroom politicking, uncertainty over the club&#039;s future and a Director of Football who bought players for him made his job even more difficult.

There&#039;s a case for saying Coleman - as much as I liked the guy - seriously squandered the inheritence. He took Tigana&#039;s team to ninth but failed to kick on from there. Bought a lot of dross in the transfer market, dismantled Tigana&#039;s excellent fitness regime and changed the playing philosophy. The football had become very stale by the end and we were dropping like a stone.

The less said about Sanchez the better.

As for our identity, I think club&#039;s have identities largely through traditions than the evolution of a team. I suspect the rest of the country might just (for the first time since the 60s) be giving us a second look now but we&#039;ve got a gorgeous ground, steeped in history and tradition, friendly fans and we play attractive football. Isn&#039;t that enough?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s pretty harsh to say Tigana underachieved. He got us up at the first time of asking, playing beautiful football and took us to an FA Cup semi-final and the third round of the UEFA Cup. The fact that he had to contend with boardroom politicking, uncertainty over the club&#8217;s future and a Director of Football who bought players for him made his job even more difficult.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a case for saying Coleman &#8211; as much as I liked the guy &#8211; seriously squandered the inheritence. He took Tigana&#8217;s team to ninth but failed to kick on from there. Bought a lot of dross in the transfer market, dismantled Tigana&#8217;s excellent fitness regime and changed the playing philosophy. The football had become very stale by the end and we were dropping like a stone.</p>
<p>The less said about Sanchez the better.</p>
<p>As for our identity, I think club&#8217;s have identities largely through traditions than the evolution of a team. I suspect the rest of the country might just (for the first time since the 60s) be giving us a second look now but we&#8217;ve got a gorgeous ground, steeped in history and tradition, friendly fans and we play attractive football. Isn&#8217;t that enough?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
